COVID-19 Advice from EM Doctors in the U.S. and ItalyAndrea Duca, MD - Milan, Italy / Interview by Sam Ashoo, MD, FACEPYesterday I interviewed Dr. Andrea Duca, an EM boarded physician in Milan, Italy. I learned a lot during the VERY sobering interview with him. If you'd like to listen, the episode is live here: blubrry.com/emplify/57487286/... or you may search your podcast app for "EMplify" and listen there instead. Colleague from Pacific NorthwestFor those of you who haven't hit the surge yet: please pay close attention. Demand that your hospital get ready. Don't be passive. If your admins don't get it, go above and beyond until someone listens or do it yourselves. Important things to have in play in no particular order: 1. The surge starts suddenly. We went from low low volumes for a week and then one day the waiting room was full of respiratory patients. Don't be lulled by the lull. Dr. Vasquez, ArizonaRead this study on 3/17. It's a well done study worth reading. By 3/18 I was emotionally prepared for what is to come. There are some very important conclusions to take from this for Emergency physicians. Take them for what you will, but I invite discussion (although admittedly they sound not happy)
So for me, I'd propose each state ACEP chapter ask some questions to your hospital and political leaders:
I apologize if this is morbid but... Dr. Todd TaylorImpact of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team - 16 March 2020 Attached & at: www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/... SUMMARY OF SALIENT POINTS · For an unmitigated epidemic, the authors predict critical care bed capacity would have been exceeded as early as the second week in April, with an eventual peak in critical care bed demand 30 times greater than the maximum supply (Figure 2). · It is necessary to balance the timing of introduction of mitigation with the scale of disruption imposed and the period over which the interventions can be maintained. In this scenario, interventions can limit transmission to the extent that little herd immunity is acquired – leading to the possibility that a second wave of infection is seen once interventions are lifted. · The most effective combination of interventions is predicted to be a combination of case isolation, home quarantine and social distancing of those most at risk (those over 70 to demand on critical care capacity). · In combination, this intervention strategy is predicted to reduce peak critical care demand by 2/3 and cut deaths in half. · However, this "optimal" mitigation scenario would still result in an 8-fold higher peak demand for critical care beds above capacity in both Great Brittian and the US. · Stopping mass gatherings is predicted to have relatively little impact because the contact-time is relatively small compared to the time spent at home, in schools or workplaces and in other community locations such as bars and restaurants. · The single most impactful suppression strategy is quarantine of entire families at the first sign of infection. · Our results demonstrate that it will be necessary to layer multiple interventions, regardless the overarching policy goal. · Overall, our results suggest that population-wide social distancing applied to the population as a whole would have the largest impact; and in combination with other interventions – notably home isolation of cases and school and university closure – has the potential to suppress transmission below the threshold of R=1 required to rapidly reduce case incidence. · A minimum policy for effective suppression is therefore population-wide social distancing combined with home isolation of cases and school and university closure. · To avoid a rebound in transmission, these policies will need to be maintained until large stocks of vaccine are available to immunize the population – which could be 18 months or more. · We therefore conclude that epidemic suppression is the only viable strategy at the current time. |